The Democrats want you to forget the past and truth...

“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence.” - Charles Austin Beard
------------------------------------------------------------
If this is true, I suggest that everyone needs to go out and read as much of our Founding Fathers words which started this awesome experiment of self government.

Do you know why someone would be afraid of our founding fathers? Because they supported the rule of the People for the People, not the Government for the Elite. I truly do not care which party someone belongs to, if they violate what was intended for us and created for us by the Founding Fathers, it is our duty and right to TEAR them down. It is something described and explained to us in the Declaration of Independence.

Did you know that? We are told to destroy our Government if it becomes something other than what was created. Check this out.

The Declaration of Independence
The Want, Will, and Hopes of the People

(This is the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence)

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

Why would someone not want you to know these things? I can find quotes like these all over the writings of our Founding Fathers, and in truth, more of them were afraid of creating something which would become despotic therefore spoke at length of how We The People should and must hold our government to account in all forms and practices.

This is quite honestly the intent of the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution. If you doubt this, please research Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Mao Tse Tung and how before killing millions disarmed the populace.

Lets look as some of the quotes of our Founding Fathers to see if I am right or wrong:

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions,
that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong,
but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and
then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere.

Thomas Jefferson, letter to Abigail Adams, February 22, 1787

On every unauthoritative exercise of power by the legislature must the
people rise in rebellion or their silence be construed into a surrender of that
power to them? If so, how many rebellions should we have had already?

Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, Query 12, 1782

Fear is the foundation of most governments; but it is so sordid and brutal a
passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so stupid and
miserable, that Americans will not be likely to approve of any political
institution which is founded on it.

John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776

Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety,
prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private
interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone
have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute
government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their
protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.

John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776

"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the
liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people
are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then
will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal
invader."

Samuel Adams, 1779

Man, I love that last quote. Apply that one to our country and culture today. I do not believe that I am wrong that our government has decided to know set laws in place which determine the Virtues we must follow and carry out in our daily lives, even if it is counter to your religion and beliefs.

I thought laws were originally set below the accepted moral and ethical levels of The People? Oh, they were, but now we have interesting events happening which have changed that.

What am I talking about? How about the removal and banning of the Christian Bible from Schools and Government. Heck, you can be sued for speaking about your faith now a days. But what is the Bible? Rules of living and behavior as set forth by God himself? I believe as much. Do you not find it interesting that these are the same rules set forth for all of us in the basis of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity?

Our original laws set forth for us were based upon Judao-Christian values. Notice how as that value is lost in our nation that we suffer from more crime and wrong doing?

Do you own research, study our true history, and learn the truthes that our nation was built upon. After doing such, examine the intent of those running for office or already in office.

Turn off your TV. Go and read up on our past and history. You will be amazed at what you find. I warn you however. You will find things which our media and polititions have bent so much it will make you want to go out and beat them.

Where to begin? I suggest reading our entire Declaration of Indepenence followed by our Constitution. After that, read the words written by the signers. I also suggest the Federalist Papers.

Do Not Take Anything At Face Value! You are being played by confidence games daily. Go find the truth. Make your own choices and do not base them on anything but what you take from it, not even me.

Someone sees Tom Tancredo for what he is...

Tancredo's Raw Truth About Terrorism
By Diana West
Friday, November 16, 2007

Somehow, it isn't fair that with illegal immigration now a defining issue of American politics, the one politician more than any other who has taught Americans to re-imagine their land as a nation with controllable borders is trailing in the GOP presidential polls. I refer, of course, to Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo, whose congressional career has been guided by a once-seemingly impossible goal: to convince Americans that we had an illegal immigration problem.

This was something many Americans -- from the business community, with its addiction to cheap labor, to the great middle class, with its addiction to cheap childcare and household help -- all too readily denied.

If convincing people we had an illegal immigration crisis wasn't hard enough, he also had to persuade people there was a solution to this problem of porous borders that 10 or 20 million mainly Spanish-speaking illegal aliens had crossed -- and are still crossing. What are you gonna do, his detractors would say, build a fence?

Well, yes. That was one idea. And while that fence has yet to be built, it has been voted into law and signed by the president (despite his open-border self). In the course of the debate, Tancredo has helped many Americans once again think of the United States as a sovereign nation, not a honey pot -- a worthy testament to a congressional career that he will be bringing to an end by not seeking re-election.

But what about Tancredo's presidential campaign? This week, he debuted a new TV commercial challenging voters, as well as his fellow candidates, to link the illegal alien issue to the national security threat of jihadist terrorism. And despite this being the age of jihadist terrorism, Tancredo's TV spot is a first. It highlights the fact that our borders are open to more than just cheap labor by depicting the ease with which a terrorist enters a shopping mall -- like other terrorists entered the London Underground, the Spanish trains, a school in Russia -- to deposit a backpack-bomb that explodes at the end of the commercial. The message is refreshingly direct: "Tancredo. Before it's too late."

Yes, there is something surreal about the commercial, but not because of the content. What is surreal is the hysteria that has greeted it. After 9/11, 3/11, 7/7, Amman, Amsterdam, Baghdad, Bali, Beslan, Davao, Hadera, Haifa, Jakarta, Jerusalem, Nairobi, New Dehli, Sharm al-Sheik, Tel Aviv, Tunisia and more, what dolt doesn't wonder if and when jihadist cowards will attack our own trains, markets, hotels and restaurants? Tom Tancredo has only taken the mature and responsible course -- not coincidentally, also the politically incorrect course -- by raising this deadly serious issue with the American people. But for this he is castigated as a "fear-monger."

Indeed, as if on cue, the Tancredo-hostile Denver Post editorialized: "New Tancredo ad is a sad case of fear-mongering," adding that Tancredo had "reached a new low -- if that's possible."

"Is Tom Tancredo Too `Tough on Terror'?" blogged the Washington Post. Conclusion to reach: Way too tough.

The Los Angeles Times quoted one Dennis Goldford, a professor of politics at Drake University in Des Moines, who described the Tancredo commercial as "an incredibly fear-based kind of advertisement that some might say is trying to terrorize people into supporting his view." This is rich. Acknowledging terrorism as act of terrorism: Professor, grade yourself an "F."

Meanwhile, the Rocky Mountain News didn't claim even a shred of impartial coverage, sub-heading its report on the Tancredo commercial: "Expert says terrorism images are so blatant commercial won't work." The "expert" here was Bruce Gronbeck, a communications professor at the University of Iowa who teaches a course on politics on the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks (heaven help his students). He said: "This is just blatant, raw fear images, and they've never worked in the United States, period."

"Fear-mongering." "Terrorizing people." "Blatant, raw fear images." The way the "experts" talk, they make it sound as if Tancredo is subjecting citizens to sick "Saw" dismemberment fantasies -- not the plain, awful reality of our tragically jihad-diminished day. Yes, our shopping malls are targets. And yes, our borders are porous. Ignoring this makes it easier to live in a world of pretend, but that's not traditionally where our best presidents have come from. Indeed, how does any credible, responsible presidential candidate ignore the potential connection between shopping-mall targets and porous borders?

Answer: At this nation's politically correct peril.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2007/11/16/tancredos_raw_truth_about_terrorism